Visit Jonathan D. Miller's column >>

JONATHAN D. MILLERHome Page

"I will protest the sword if it's not wielded well"
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 7; Links Seeded: 89
Member Since: 7/2006

Huckabee on the $700B bailout

advertisement

I got this email from Mike Huckabee, and I agree with him 100%. Its a shame that the Republicans did not choose him!

Frankly, I'm disappointed and disgusted with my own Republican party as I watch them attempt to strong-arm a bailout of some of America's biggest corporations by asking the taxpayers to suck up the staggering results of the hubris, greed, and arrogance of those who sought to make a quick buck by throwing the dice. They lost, but want the rest of us to cover their bets so they won't be effected in their lavish lifestyles as they figure out how to spend their tens of millions and in some cases, hundreds of millions in bonuses and compensation which was their reward for not only sinking their companies, but basically doing the same to the entire American economy.

It's especially disconcerting to see the very people who pilloried me during the Presidential campaign for being a "populist" and not "understanding Wall Street" to now line up like thirsty dogs at the Washington, D. C. water dish, otherwise known as Congress, and plead for help. I thought these guys were the smartest people in America! I thought that taxpayers like you and I were similar to the people at the U. N. who have no translator speaking into their headset - that we just needed to trust those that I called the power bunch in the "Wall Street to Washington axis of power."

The idea of a government bailout in which we'd entrust $700 billion to one man without Congressional oversight or accountability is absurd. My party or not, that is insanity and I believe unconstitutional.

Will there be far-reaching consequences without some intervention? Probably, but we honestly don't know since we've really never seen this level of greed and stupidity all rolled into one massive move. But may I suggest that letting "Uncle Sugar" step in and bail out the billionaires who made the mess will be far worse and will start a long line of companies and individuals who will demand the same of the government---which last time I checked means that they will be demanding it out of YOU and ME. This is not money that Congress is risking from THEIR pockets or future, but ours. Many if not most of us have already experienced lost value on our homes, retirement accounts, and pensions. Now they'd like for us to assume some further risks so they won't have to.

What happened to the "free market" idea? Is that only our view when we WIN and when we LOSE, we ask the government to come in and take away the pain?

If you are a small business owner, is this the way it works at your place? When you have a bad month, a bad year, or face having to close, can you go up to Congress and get them to write YOU a fat check to take away your risk?

Some of what contributed to this disaster is too much government in the form of Sarbanes/Oxley. Some is due to the tax structure that created the hunger for companies to "game" the system. Some is the common sense that was ignored like loaning money to people who can't pay it back.

Wall Street has become Las Vegas east, but at least in Vegas, people KNOW they are gambling and they don't expect the government to cover their losses at the tables. In Wall Street, they do. And the American taxpayer burdens the responsibility.

If Congress wants to do something, here are some suggestions:

1. Eliminate ALL capital gains taxes and taxes on savings and dividends right now. Free up the capital and encourage investment. This is the kind of economic stimulus the Fair Tax would bring and if Congress is going to lose money, let them lose it with lower taxes, not with public dollar bailouts of private market mistakes.

2. Repeal Sarbanes/Oxley. It has failed. It was supposed to prevent this. It didn't. Kill it.

3. Demand that the executives who steered their ships into the ground be forced to pay back the losses of their companies. Of course, they can't, so let them work and give back to the government and they can live like the people they put on the streets or kept there. It makes no sense to put them in jail—that's just more they will cost you and me. I'd rather them go out and earn money—just not get to keep so much of it this time. I'm not talking about limiting CEO salaries---just those of the people who now are up in Washington begging for help because they ruined their companies.

Attempts by Democrats and Republicans to blame each other is nonsense. They are both guilty and ought to own up and admit it. They all lived off big campaign contributions and the swill of the lobbyists who strong armed them into permission to steal. Enough of blame. Fix it!

This would be a start. If we don't hold these guys responsible, we are all finished.

  • 19 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
17
5.8
{"commentId":3088918,"authorDomain":"jdmiller82"}

Some of my favorite lines:

A bailout of some of America's biggest corporations by asking the taxpayers to suck up the staggering results of the hubris, greed, and arrogance of those who sought to make a quick buck by throwing the dice. They lost, but want the rest of us to cover their bets so they won't be effected in their lavish lifestyles as they figure out how to spend their tens of millions and in some cases, hundreds of millions in bonuses and compensation which was their reward for not only sinking their companies, but basically doing the same to the entire American economy.
The idea of a government bailout in which we'd entrust $700 billion to one man without Congressional oversight or accountability is absurd. My party or not, that is insanity and I believe unconstitutional.
We've really never seen this level of greed and stupidity all rolled into one massive move.
{"commentId":3088918,"threadId":"366606","contentId":"1906909","authorDomain":"jdmiller82"}
  • 11 votes
Reply#1 - Wed Sep 24, 2008 5:25 PM EDT
{"commentId":3089501,"authorDomain":"DrDanny"}

Huckabee speaks with clarity and conviction, as always. His thoughts should seriously be listened to. I echo your thoughts, Johnathan, it's a shame Huckabee didn't become Republican nominee. He's proving himself to be a very astute politician in difficult times.

{"commentId":3089501,"threadId":"366606","contentId":"1906909","authorDomain":"DrDanny"}
  • 12 votes
Reply#2 - Wed Sep 24, 2008 5:33 PM EDT
{"commentId":3101438,"authorDomain":"Strath3303"}

Though I disagree with most points and views of Huckabee he nails it dead on here. I can say, I don't think he would beat Obama regardless, but I can see now that he would have run a far better campaign than McCain. He ended up finishing in second place amongst Republicans on a shoestring budget. Also, even I have to admit the guy is damn likable and usually good with the one liners.

{"commentId":3101438,"threadId":"366606","contentId":"1906909","authorDomain":"Strath3303"}
  • 2 votes
#2.1 - Wed Sep 24, 2008 10:29 PM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":3090470,"authorDomain":"EllieP"}
But may I suggest that letting "Uncle Sugar" step in and bail out the billionaires who made the mess will be far worse and will start a long line of companies and individuals who will demand the same of the government---which last time I checked means that they will be demanding it out of YOU and ME.

Executives, a la Mrs. Gregory, who high-tailed out of there were the foreseers. I just hope the golden parachute checks haven't cleared.

Huckabee does have a lot of wisdom and common sense to add...I hope they start listening.

{"commentId":3090470,"threadId":"366606","contentId":"1906909","authorDomain":"EllieP"}
  • 6 votes
Reply#3 - Wed Sep 24, 2008 5:48 PM EDT
{"commentId":3091419,"authorDomain":"ianfwalter"}

Damn populists, talking common sense. Surely he knows he doesn't have the proper credentials to comment on such lofty matters?

Good for you, Mike.

{"commentId":3091419,"threadId":"366606","contentId":"1906909","authorDomain":"ianfwalter"}
  • 8 votes
Reply#4 - Wed Sep 24, 2008 6:02 PM EDT
{"commentId":3091979,"authorDomain":"btarl63"}

I like the part about Sarbanes/Oxley. It's become nightmare! Incidentally, I think it was Reid who wrote an article a year ago for the NY Times lambasting the S/O act as far too much government regulation. Then he turns around and says we don't have enough government regulation. Well, which is it?

{"commentId":3091979,"threadId":"366606","contentId":"1906909","authorDomain":"btarl63"}
  • 9 votes
Reply#5 - Wed Sep 24, 2008 6:12 PM EDT
{"commentId":3093480,"authorDomain":"stevehouse"}
The idea of a government bailout in which we'd entrust $700 billion to one man without Congressional oversight or accountability is absurd.

*snert* Really!? This is what I liked about Huckabee... Take out that "social conservatism" bit and he'd have been a force to reckon with.

{"commentId":3093480,"threadId":"366606","contentId":"1906909","authorDomain":"stevehouse"}
  • 4 votes
Reply#6 - Wed Sep 24, 2008 6:32 PM EDT
{"commentId":3098394,"authorDomain":"jstret1"}

I think the parties responsible for our current economic state have dealt a better blow to our great country than Osama Bin Laden. As such I think that they should be treated as terrorists. Their personal assets should be stripped and used to fund the bail out. They should then be sent to Guantanamo with the rest of the terrorists.

{"commentId":3098394,"threadId":"366606","contentId":"1906909","authorDomain":"jstret1"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#7 - Wed Sep 24, 2008 8:37 PM EDT
{"commentId":3098531,"authorDomain":"jstret1"}
John StretavskiDeleted
{"commentId":3099778,"authorDomain":"F-3"}

You know, there are plenty of thing's I disagree with Mike Huckabee about. This is not one of them. The man has shown in these words that honesty and integrity mean something to him. Now if he could only teach that lesson to the whole political spectrum...

{"commentId":3099778,"threadId":"366606","contentId":"1906909","authorDomain":"F-3"}
  • 3 votes
Reply#9 - Wed Sep 24, 2008 9:25 PM EDT
{"commentId":3101133,"authorDomain":"jdmiller82"}
The man has shown in these words that honesty and integrity mean something to him. Now if he could only teach that lesson to the whole political spectrum...

So say we all!

{"commentId":3101133,"threadId":"366606","contentId":"1906909","authorDomain":"jdmiller82"}
  • 5 votes
#9.1 - Wed Sep 24, 2008 10:17 PM EDT
{"commentId":3101344,"authorDomain":"stevehouse"}

I'll sign my name to that.

{"commentId":3101344,"threadId":"366606","contentId":"1906909","authorDomain":"stevehouse"}
  • 3 votes
#9.2 - Wed Sep 24, 2008 10:25 PM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":3117184,"authorDomain":"juno"}
Enough of blame. Fix it!

Absolutely!

{"commentId":3117184,"threadId":"366606","contentId":"1906909","authorDomain":"juno"}
  • 5 votes
Reply#10 - Thu Sep 25, 2008 1:56 PM EDT
{"commentId":3120023,"authorDomain":"amjrmd"}

I'm trying to figure out how he didn't get the Republican nomination? Oh, that's right, he tells the truth, that disqualifies him from any position in DC. Huckabee/Palin - 2012?

{"commentId":3120023,"threadId":"366606","contentId":"1906909","authorDomain":"amjrmd"}
  • 4 votes
#10.1 - Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:00 PM EDT
{"commentId":3139236,"authorDomain":"juno"}

I love Mr. Huckabee. I truly do. And for awhile considered voting for him myself, and know many who did.

Why he didn't take it, though, has everything to do with him having been a Preacher. Being a man of 'silent' faith is one thing, but a Preacher?!? Too many just don't trust it. That's my opinion, anyway.

I actually envision a contest between Hillary and Sarah for pres. in '12.

{"commentId":3139236,"threadId":"366606","contentId":"1906909","authorDomain":"juno"}
  • 3 votes
#10.2 - Fri Sep 26, 2008 9:16 AM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":3124511,"authorDomain":"festivewarrior"}
This would be a start. If we don't hold these guys responsible, we are all finished.

Well, dang it.
What should we do?
We can't stop it.
How can we hold them responsible?
I love Mike Huckabee but what is the point to this?
I read this frustration here but I didn't see any solutions?
Did he just want to connect with Folks?
(how'd you get an email from him? He didn't email me....... ;-(

I am voting this up.
It was good of you to share it with us.

{"commentId":3124511,"threadId":"366606","contentId":"1906909","authorDomain":"festivewarrior"}
  • 4 votes
Reply#11 - Thu Sep 25, 2008 4:44 PM EDT
{"commentId":3147582,"authorDomain":"AlexandraJolicoeur"}

Once again, Huckabee is dead on. It is a shame he didn't get the republican nomination- and I contend he has just as much ability (if not more) to beat Obama as McCain does. And, while I do like Sarah Palin, I think Huckabee would have been a more solid choice for VP. I'm hoping he'll have another chance in 2012 should Obama win.

{"commentId":3147582,"threadId":"366606","contentId":"1906909","authorDomain":"AlexandraJolicoeur"}
  • 5 votes
Reply#12 - Fri Sep 26, 2008 2:31 PM EDT
{"commentId":3232017,"authorDomain":"ProgrammerDude"}

I'm not entirely down with his politics, but I do like Mike. I've enjoyed every speech I've heard from him and every public appearance I've seen. Seems like a right guy to me, plus he's a guitar player! :-)

{"commentId":3232017,"threadId":"366606","contentId":"1906909","authorDomain":"ProgrammerDude"}
  • 4 votes
Reply#13 - Tue Sep 30, 2008 7:39 PM EDT
{"commentId":3234268,"authorDomain":"jdmiller82"}

I believe he plays bass, but yeah he's cool that way too!

{"commentId":3234268,"threadId":"366606","contentId":"1906909","authorDomain":"jdmiller82"}
  • 5 votes
#13.1 - Tue Sep 30, 2008 10:43 PM EDT
{"commentId":3238092,"authorDomain":"amjrmd"}

Bass is better than guitar anyway :P (I play bass myself). I'd actually like to hear him play

{"commentId":3238092,"threadId":"366606","contentId":"1906909","authorDomain":"amjrmd"}
  • 4 votes
#13.2 - Wed Oct 1, 2008 9:43 AM EDT
Reply
{"canLink":false,"threadId":"366606","isPrivate":false}
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
{"threadId":"366606","contentId":"1906909"}
Start TrackingStart Tracking
Stop TrackingStop Tracking